Username/Email: Password:
 
Journal: Seismological Research Letter  2014 No.1  Share to Sinaweibo  Share to QQweibo  Share to Facebook  Share to Twitter    clicks:777   
Title:
Stress, Distance, Magnitude, and Clustering Influences on the Success or Failure of an Aftershock Forecast: The 2013 M 6.6 Lushan Earthquake and Other Examples
Author: Tom Parsons and Margaret Segou
Adress: U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 999, Menlo Park, California 94025 U.S.A
Abstract:

Immediately after the 12 May 2008 M 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, we began calculating the static stress change on major faults surrounding the rupture zone (Parsons et al., 2008), and Toda et al. (2008) mapped out regional Coulomb stress changes (Fig. 1). The purpose was twofold: (1) to identify the most likely locations (stress increases) of dangerous aftershocks, and (2) to conduct a prospective test of stress mapping as a rapid‐response forecast tool. The occurrence of the 20 April 2013 M 6.6 Lushan earthquake in the Longmen fault zone near Ya’an was consistent with the prospective static stress forecast; for example, press coverage in 2008 (Kuang, 2008) stated

According to their results, published in Nature on 6 July, Ya’an Thrust, Xiong Po Thrust, and Xianshuihe Fault, all near Longmen Fault where the earthquake occurred, show a notable increase in static stress changes, and therefore face a high risk of aftershocks.

“The 12 May earthquake … caused grievous losses, yet its legacy includes possible large aftershocks in the near future because it increased failure stress on important faults within and around the Sichuan basin,” write the authors.

Comment:
Write a comment about this article

To avoid abuse of the message board, all messages will be checked before publishing.